Clevererhans@lemmynsfw.com to Pale Woman@lemmynsfw.comEnglish · 2 months agoAnastasia [AI]NSFWlemmynsfw.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAnastasia [AI]NSFWlemmynsfw.comClevererhans@lemmynsfw.com to Pale Woman@lemmynsfw.comEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squareClevererhans@lemmynsfw.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoWell, the rules explicitly allow for AI, provided it’s photorealistic. But I understand your angle. Perhaps we should ask a mod to weigh in?
minus-squareAlpax@lemmynsfw.comMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoMod here. Given the low volume of AI so far in this sub (it’s the first post), I don’t think revisiting the rules is necessary right now. But if the volume increases too much, revisiting it might be a good idea.
Well, the rules explicitly allow for AI, provided it’s photorealistic.
But I understand your angle. Perhaps we should ask a mod to weigh in?
Mod here. Given the low volume of AI so far in this sub (it’s the first post), I don’t think revisiting the rules is necessary right now. But if the volume increases too much, revisiting it might be a good idea.